Mirrors of the Mahabharata: Reflected Names in Namesakes and Reflected Souls in Shadows of Self (Part-I)

  • Visitor:12
  • Published on: 2025-02-26 10:23 pm

Mirrors of the Mahabharata: Reflected Names in Namesakes and Reflected Souls in Shadows of Self (Part-I)

Dundubha’s dim eyes glowed faintly. "I was once a sage—Sahasrapada. A curse turned me into this form. My only crime was a jest gone wrong. I frightened my dearest friend, Khagam, with a straw serpent, never imagining it would make him faint with terror. In his anger, he cursed me to become like the very thing I had used to scare him. But guilt soon overtook his wrath, and with tears in his eyes, he told me, 'There is one path to your salvation. When you meet the noble Ruru of the Bhrigu lineage, your curse shall end.'" Ruru's eyes widened. "And now you are before me..." The lizard (Dundhuva literally means both snake or lizard), , revealed as Sahasrapada Ruru (one who has walked fifty steps further than Ruru), represents a wiser, experienced version of himself, who guides him towards Astika (existence, it exists), showing the journey of self-awareness. These stories exemplify the journey of self-recognition, rooted in Advaita Vedanta. As Shankaracharya explains, the self is like a crystal reflecting a red flower’s color, perceiving borrowed attributes as its own. The narratives illustrate how deviations, mistakes, and destruction can lead to cosmic understanding, where the individual self merges with the universal consciousness. To be precise it reflects the Prabimbavada concept. Pratibimba-vāda, or the "theory of reflection," is a significant concept within Advaita Vedanta, particularly as expounded in the Pañcapādikā Vivaraṇa by Prakāśātmamuni.

  • Share on:

I.  Names and Namesakes: The Echo of Identity Across Worlds

"Who’s There? Nay, Who’s Not!" A Tale of Namesake Nonsense

The Comedy of Errors Story Timeline | Shakespeare Learning Zone

It was a lively day in Ephesus. The sun hung over the city like an impatient actor waiting for his cue, casting long shadows on bustling markets and echoing laughter in crowded streets. Antipholus of Syracuse—tall, dashing, and with a confidence that could sell water to the sea—found himself accosted by a rather animated goldsmith.

“Master Antipholus!” the goldsmith exclaimed, his voice like a bell tolling urgency.

Antipholus blinked. “Sir, either my ears deceive me, or you mistake me for a ghost of your acquaintance. For I assure you, no bond of metal exists betwixt us, save the coins I keep tightly in my purse.”

The goldsmith laughed heartily, as though enjoying a private jest. “Coins, aye? And what of the chain I made for thee? Gold it was, and finer than the dawn’s first blush!”

Antipholus recoiled as if struck by lightning. “A chain? Nay, I wear no chains, save the ones forged by Fate and her sisters who delight in weaving mortal confusion.”

Unbeknownst to him, the other Antipholus—his twin, of Ephesus—was merrily walking the streets at that very moment, wearing the same face, the same gait, and, apparently, the same knack for stirring chaos.

The Comedy of Errors (Paperback) | Women & Children First

As the sun dipped lower, the tangled web of mistaken identity grew tighter. Inside a crowded tavern, Dromio of Syracuse—Antipholus’s servant—stood fuming, arms akimbo.

“Master,” he said, addressing his Antipholus, “I tell thee, there’s another me wandering this town, stealing my bread, claiming my name, and, dare I say, looking far less handsome than I!”

Antipholus groaned, rubbing his temples. “Another you? Dromio, I barely have patience for one of you. If there be two, the gods themselves must be jesting!”

“And yet,” Dromio continued, his voice rising like a crescendo, “there is one who shares my visage. A doppelgänger! A shadow unbound from the body! The very concept threatens the delicate threads of my selfhood!”

Antipholus chuckled. “Selfhood, thou sayest? Fear not, for thy selfhood is as solid as air and twice as invisible.”

By evening, the misunderstanding had reached its comedic zenith. Both Antipholuses and both Dromios found themselves face-to-face in the bustling market square.

Antipholus of Ephesus, spotting his twin, exclaimed, “Art thou a mirror, enchanted to mock my every move? Or hath nature herself repeated her draft to perfect her craft?”

His twin retorted, “Nay, thou art but a counterfeit, a poor imitation! Look how my wit outshines thine by leagues!”

Dromio of Syracuse interrupted, addressing the other Dromio. “And you! Who art thou to steal my face? Dost thou not see the folly in trying to outshine the original?”

The other Dromio shrugged. “Original? Nay, I’m the better edition—improved, with fewer flaws.”

Shakespeare’s The Comedy of Errors thrives on absurd chaos, weaving mistaken identities into a witty meditation on identity and perception. Through Antipholus and Dromio, he explores how names shape reputation and reality, prompting the question: do we define our identity, or do others? As Shakespeare muses, “Am I not myself? Nay, who is myself if thou art me?” Names become both mirrors and challenges, reflecting the complexity of being human.

Names in Shakespearean drama hold magic beyond mere identification—they drive narrative, contrast characters, and explore human duality. Take Antonio: in The Merchant of Venice, he is a melancholic friend risking his life, while in The Tempest, he’s a usurping schemer. Meanwhile, the Antonios in Twelfth Night and Much Ado About Nothing embody loyalty in different shades.

Shakespeare’s history plays further reveal how names echo across generations. The Henries—IV, V, and VI—offer a spectrum of leadership, from politically worn to battle-hardened to tragic. The Richards—II and III—contrast poetic introspection with ruthless ambition. By reusing names, Shakespeare crafts a prism of identity, where history, fate, and human nature intertwine in an eternal dance of contrast and continuity.

Sebastian, a name tied to storms and fate, appears in Twelfth Night as Viola’s lost twin, caught in comedic chaos, and in The Tempest as Alonso’s scheming brother, plotting treachery. Both linked to shipwrecks, one brings love and reunion, the other ambition and betrayal—Shakespeare’s playful contrast of comedy and tragedy. Again, Queen Margaret in Henry VI wields political power, while Margaret in Much Ado About Nothing is a servant caught in a mistaken identity farce. These contrasting Margarets critique how names and roles are shaped by class and society. Further, we can consider the case of Prince Hamlet, named after his deceased father, blurs the line between past and present, embodying existential struggle. His name is a haunting reminder of duty, destiny, and death.

Thus, in Shakespeare’s world, names define, deceive, and reflect the paradoxes of human identity.

So the next time someone asks, “What’s in a name?” you might reply, “Enough to write a Shakespearean play—or two.”

Similarly, from Sophocles to Dostoevsky, the tradition of namesakes proves to be a universal phenomenon, offering fertile ground for narrative innovation and philosophical inquiry.


Sophocles' Oedipus Rex presents Oedipus as a tragic king doomed by fate, while Oedipus at Colonus transforms him into a figure of redemption. His name bridges power and humility, knowledge and ignorance, sin and forgiveness—an archetype of human struggle and irony. In Jane Eyre, John Eyre offers Jane security, John Rivers embodies duty without warmth, and John Reed symbolizes cruelty. Brontë’s use of “John” explores contrasting influences on Jane’s life, highlighting how the same name can represent vastly different fates. Dostoevsky’s Ivan Karamazov debates faith and morality, while Tolstoy’s Ivan Ilyich confronts the fear of death. Both embody existential struggles—one philosophical, the other pragmatic. Recurring names in literature connect identity, fate, and transformation, reflecting universal human concerns and societal critiques across cultures and eras.

Classics and Mythology: Power of Names that Echo Through Time

In the vast tapestry of human history, certain names achieve an almost mythical resonance. These names are more than mere labels—they embody ideals, archetypes, and narratives that persist across generations and cultures. When these names reappear in different texts, they create a dialogue between past and present, illustrating how namesakes transcend boundaries of time and space.

Name

Symbolism & Literary Reinterpretations

Achilles: The Eternal Warrior

Achilles, the unparalleled hero of The Iliad, embodies both valor and vulnerability. In Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida, he is portrayed with greater complexity, revealing his flaws and humanity. Madeline Miller’s The Song of Achilles reimagines him through a deeply personal lens, emphasizing his relationship with Patroclus. These reinterpretations highlight Achilles as both a symbol of strength and a reminder of human fragility.

Helen: The Face That Launched a Thousand Ships

Helen of Troy is synonymous with beauty, desire, and historical upheaval. In Homer’s epics, she is a catalyst for the Trojan War, while Christopher Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus immortalizes her with the famous line: “Was this the face that launched a thousand ships?” Her name embodies both admiration and blame, reflecting shifting perspectives on agency, responsibility, and the cost of beauty.


The Song of Achilles: Buy The Song of Achilles by Miller Madeline at Low  Price in India | Flipkart.com

Dr. Faustus by Christopher Marlowe | Goodreads

Names like Achilles, Helen, Aeneas, and Arthur demonstrate how mythological and literary figures can shape cultural consciousness. As these names resurface in different epochs and contexts, they acquire new dimensions, adapting to the moral, social, and artistic concerns of the times.

The phenomenon of namesakes in classics and mythology underscores humanity’s need to revisit and reinterpret its shared stories. These names serve as bridges between the ancient and the modern, reminding us that while the specifics of our lives may change, the archetypes they represent remain deeply relevant.

More Names Modern Narratives: Bridging Archetypes and Innovation

Name

Modern Narrative

Archetypal Connection

Symbolism and Themes

Dante

Devil May Cry

The protagonist, Dante, is inspired by Dante Alighieri, the author of The Divine Comedy. While the literary Dante journeys through Hell, Purgatory, and Paradise in search of divine redemption, the video game Dante is a demon-slaying warrior navigating supernatural battlefields. Despite their different worlds, both characters share a journey of moral conflict and self-discovery.

The name "Dante" bridges classical literature with modern gaming, emphasizing the eternal struggle between light and darkness. Dante’s journey in Devil May Cry is one of redemption and self-realization, much like the poet’s spiritual awakening—though in the game, it is punctuated by intense combat and supernatural battles. The theme of inner turmoil and righteousness remains central.





Zelda and Link

The Legend of Zelda series

Princess Zelda and Link embody timeless heroic archetypes. Zelda represents wisdom and resilience, guiding the hero’s journey, while Link is the courageous warrior destined to face evil. Their recurring names across various timelines and realities reinforce the cyclical nature of mythic storytelling. Their roles are reminiscent of mythological cycles like Vishnu’s avatars in Indian tradition or the Greek hero Perseus, whose story is retold in different ways.

The constancy of Zelda and Link's names across multiple games mirrors the idea of eternal heroism and destiny. They symbolize the balance of wisdom, courage, and power, echoing myths where heroes are reborn across ages to fulfill their fate. This reinforces the idea that some stories—and the values they represent—are timeless.

Subtlety and Humor in Modern Literature

Namesakes in contemporary literature often carry subtler meanings or serve as humorous nods.

Character(s)

Source

Narrative Purpose

Symbolism and Themes

Jay Gatsby and the Lesser Gatsby

The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald

The minor character, distantly related to Jay Gatsby, shares his last name but has no real significance in Gatsby’s life. This subtle inclusion highlights Gatsby’s isolation and how even supposed "relatives" are irrelevant to his self-made identity.

The shared surname emphasizes Gatsby’s loneliness and the illusion of connection. Despite his grand persona, he remains fundamentally alone, reinforcing themes of self-invention, social ambition, and the ultimate hollowness of his dream.

Harry Potter and Harry Potter (Textbook Author)

Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling

The protagonist, Harry Potter, shares his name with the fictional author of A History of Magic. This detail does not impact the plot but serves as a playful Easter egg for readers, enhancing the depth of Rowling’s wizarding world.

The duplicate name adds humor and world-building, illustrating the rich, layered nature of the Harry Potter universe. It highlights how names can exist across generations and contexts, much like in real history, giving the magical world a sense of authenticity and charm.


Thematic Resonance in Names

Across these narratives, names hold layers of meaning that enhance both character and story:

  • Redemption and Duality: Dante and Arthur represent timeless battles—between good and evil, honor and dishonor, destiny and free will. Their names draw from historical and literary archetypes, blending modern narratives with ancient ideals.

  • Eternal Cycles: Zelda and Link’s repeated roles across different eras symbolize the enduring nature of heroism and the inseparability of destiny and identity.

  • Humor and World-Building: Names in modern literature, like the two Gatsbys or the two Harry Potters, showcase how names can be used to add depth or lighthearted touches to a story.

This interplay of names across genres and mediums underscores their universal appeal. Whether evoking mythological gravitas or playful nuance, names continue to be powerful symbols that connect us to both the past and the present.

Fun Exploration: Gaming Characters Sharing Names

Video games often surprise us with their characters, not just through their stories and abilities but also in the fascinating overlaps in their names. Whether intentional nods or coincidental occurrences, these shared names provide unexpected layers of connection between entirely different gaming worlds. Let’s dive into more examples of famous gaming characters that share the same name and explore the quirky contrasts they bring.



CAPPY VS KIRBY Which One Is Better? - (kirby Versus Super Mario)

I am currently playing a game about Joker's life when he was young, and now  i keep asking to myself : why did Joker never summoned Arsene when he was  facing Batman ?? :

Character(s)

Game Series

Character Description

Resonance

Cappy

Super Mario Odyssey and Kirby Series

In Super Mario Odyssey, Cappy is Mario’s loyal companion with the power to possess objects. In Kirby, Cappy is a minor mushroom-like enemy.

From a helpful ally to a whimsical adversary, Cappy’s name highlights how flexible and dynamic names can be across genres.

Leon

Resident Evil and Star Fox

Leon Kennedy in Resident Evil is a determined rookie cop-turned-hero battling bioweapons. Leon Powalski in Star Fox is a ruthless space pirate.

Despite being a hero in one and a villain in another, the name Leon carries a sense of determination and intensity in both characters.

Joker

Batman Arkham Series and Persona 5

The Batman Arkham Joker is a master of chaos, manipulation, and anarchy. The Persona 5 Joker is a silent protagonist whose morality is shaped by player choice.

Whether as a chaotic villain or an adaptable protagonist, the name Joker conveys unpredictability and subversion.


Why These Shared Names Matter

These overlaps aren’t just amusing coincidences—they reflect a broader narrative pattern in gaming. Shared names often evoke archetypal roles, universal traits, or thematic parallels. They also create connections for players, adding an extra layer of intrigue to their gaming experience.

Bonus Thought: Have you ever considered how the name "Player" itself, while generic, becomes a universal identity that binds gamers across worlds? From silent protagonists to customizable avatars, the player becomes the ultimate shared identity in gaming narratives.

Thus, names are more than just labels—they’re gateways to personalities, stories, and worlds. Whether through direct inspiration, playful nods, or pure coincidence, these shared names deepen our appreciation of gaming’s diverse storytelling potential. So, the next time you meet a familiar name in a different game, take a moment to savor the layers of meaning it carries.

Popular Anime Characters Who Share the Same Name - But Have Opposite Personalities

Names are integral to a character’s identity, often reflecting deep aspects of their personality or backstory. In anime, character names can carry significant meaning, shaping how they are perceived by audiences. Interestingly, some anime characters share the same name but exhibit vastly different personalities. This juxtaposition provides a fascinating contrast in how names can be interpreted and how they can influence the narrative of each character. Below, we’ll explore several anime characters who share names yet are polar opposites in terms of their traits and behaviors.


Yuno from Black Clover - Stunning HD WallpaperHD wallpaper: Gasai Yuno, Future Diary Yuno Gasai digital wallpaper,  Artistic | Wallpaper Flare

Character Pair

Personality and Traits

Yuno Gasai (Future Diary) & Yuno (Black Clover)

Yuno Gasai is a yandere character, obsessively devoted to Yukiteru Amano. Behind her seemingly sweet demeanor lies a dangerous willingness to resort to extreme violence to protect her love interest. Yuno (Black Clover) is the opposite—calm, stoic, and driven by his ambition to become the Wizard King. He is highly skilled in magic and remains emotionally reserved, embodying quiet strength rather than chaotic obsession.

Benimaru Shinmon (Fire Force) & Benimaru (Reincarnated as a Slime)

Benimaru Shinmon is a pyrokinetic captain known for his calm demeanor and fierce loyalty to his city. While he is respected, his independent and sometimes reckless actions can cause collateral damage. Benimaru (Reincarnated as a Slime), also a fire user, has a more relaxed and humorous personality. As Rimuru’s right-hand man, he is fiercely loyal but more approachable and expressive compared to Shinmon’s serious nature.


Famous Names, Fictional Faces: 11 Movie Characters That Shared Iconic Monikers

This section on fictional movie characters who share names with famous real-life individuals reveals the surprising and sometimes humorous connections between the world of film and pop culture. It shows how movie characters, through their unique names, can inadvertently echo the identities of celebrities or other well-known figures.

Actor & Film

Character Name

Coincidental Connection

Raymond Burr (Godzilla, King of the Monsters!, 1956)

Steve Martin

The name later became associated with comedian Steve Martin, creating an amusing contrast between the serious reporter and the funnyman.

Noah Hathaway (Troll, 1986)

Harry Potter Jr.

The character predates J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series, sparking speculation about a possible influence.

Bruce Willis (Striking Distance, 1993)

Tom Hardy

Years later, actor Tom Hardy rose to fame, adding an unexpected layer of coincidence to the character's name.


These examples underscore the unpredictability and serendipity involved in the process of naming characters in film. Sometimes names are chosen to honor or reference famous individuals, and other times they simply align by chance, creating surprising and often humorous connections. This interplay between fictional names and real-world fame adds an extra layer of enjoyment for audiences who, in hindsight, can reflect on how names evolve and become iconic over time

The Power of Namesakes: Identity, Legacy, and Cultural Influence

Category

Description

Names Within Families: Legacy and Continuity

Naming children after ancestors honors heritage and preserves family history. It symbolizes remembrance and hope while embedding personal identity in a broader familial story. However, it can also create pressure, as younger individuals may feel overshadowed by their namesake’s achievements.

Namesakes in Public Life: Aspirations and Expectations

Sharing a name with a historical or public figure can evoke pride or pressure. Individuals may feel expectations to live up to their namesake’s legacy, such as being named after Mahatma Gandhi or Marie Curie. On the other hand, it can also serve as inspiration to embody the values associated with the name.

The Curious Case of Name Overlap: Accidental Connections

Namesakes can arise by chance, leading to humorous or surprising connections. Mistaken emails, calls, or social mix-ups due to shared names create moments of serendipity, highlighting the unexpected ways identity can overlap.

Namesakes in Pop Culture: Representation and Relatability

Popular names in media reflect societal trends. Names like "Emma" or "Liam" resonate with modern audiences, while "Elizabeth" or "Henry" evoke timelessness. Individuals sharing names with famous fictional characters may experience pride or playful teasing, such as being called "Harry" during the Harry Potter craze.


The Broader Implications of Namesakes

Namesakes are more than just coincidences or traditions; they are a testament to humanity’s interconnectedness. By sharing names, individuals become part of a broader network of meaning that spans time and space. Whether through mythology, literature, or everyday life, the phenomenon of namesakes reveals how names carry stories, values, and aspirations that shape our understanding of ourselves and our place in the world.

Theme

Concept

Explanation

Names and Identity

Philosophical Inquiry

Names serve as unique identifiers, yet when shared, they challenge individuality and highlight a connection to collective experiences.


Existential Philosophy

A shared name may suggest a common destiny or purpose, as Sartre’s philosophy suggests that identity is shaped through chosen actions.

Names and Memory

Preservation of the Past

Naming after a loved one serves as a bridge between generations, keeping memories alive.


Collective Memory

Aligns with Maurice Halbwachs’ concept that names contribute to cultural and familial continuity.

Continuity and Legacy

Cultural and Philosophical Perspective

Many traditions view names as a connection to a broader existential tapestry, such as in Hinduism and Buddhism.


Western vs. Eastern Views

While Western thought emphasizes individuality, Eastern traditions see namesakes as part of a shared legacy.

Namesakes as a Mirror of Society

Historical and Social Reflection

Naming trends reflect historical moments and societal values, such as naming children after iconic figures like Martin Luther King Jr. or Malala Yousafzai.

Pride and Burden

Emotional and Psychological Impact

Sharing a name with a famous figure can instill pride but also create expectations and pressure.


Self-Concept Clarity

Individuals must integrate the shared name into their identity while managing external perceptions.

Connection and Continuity

Emotional Bonds

Sharing a name can create instant connections between individuals, fostering relationships that transcend cultural and geographical boundaries.

Names and Immortality

Symbolic Legacy

Naming individuals after others aligns with Ernest Becker’s “denial of death” theory, representing a desire for symbolic immortality.

Namesakes: Personal vs. Universal

Human Experience

Names serve as a bridge between personal identity and shared cultural heritage, reinforcing interconnectedness.

Names in the Digital Age

Impact of Technology and Globalization

Social media and digital networks have expanded the reach of namesakes, creating new communities and redefining personal identity.


Online Communities

Platforms like Facebook foster groups where people with the same name connect, compare traditions, and celebrate their shared identity.



However, this global reach also comes with challenges. Common names can lead to confusion in professional settings, where recruiters or employers may struggle to differentiate between multiple candidates with identical names. Similarly, online scams or impersonation attempts often exploit the anonymity that comes with shared names.

Theme

Key Insights

Privacy in the Age of Shared Names

The digital era raises privacy concerns for individuals with common names. Shared names can lead to identity confusion, making it difficult to establish a unique online presence. Platforms must navigate ethical and technical challenges in handling search results and algorithms.


Example:A person named "John Smith" may struggle to distinguish themselves online due to the prevalence of the name. Search results may mix multiple identities, leading to misidentification.

Cultural Convergence and Naming Trends

Globalization has led to the widespread adoption of names across cultures. Popular names like “Emma,” “Sophia,” “Liam,” and “Noah” now transcend their cultural origins, creating a global network of namesakes.


Impact:While cross-cultural exchange enriches naming traditions, it also risks diminishing the uniqueness of names tied to specific heritage and traditions.

Namesakes in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

AI has blurred the boundaries between human and digital identities. Virtual assistants like Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant share names with real individuals, creating unexpected overlaps.


Example:A person named Alexa frequently hears their name used in AI interactions, altering their perception of personal identity. AI algorithms also categorize and analyze names, influencing targeted marketing and personalized recommendations.

Namesakes as Symbols of Connection in a Fragmented World

Despite technological challenges, namesakes foster human connection. Shared names transcend physical and digital barriers, creating a sense of belonging in an increasingly fragmented world.


Example:Digital communities, such as "Same Name" Facebook groups, connect individuals with shared names, promoting cultural exchange and mutual understanding.

The Symbolic Power of Namesakes

Namesakes bridge personal identity and universal human experiences, reflecting cultural, historical, and social narratives.

Namesakes and the Question of Uniqueness

The concept of namesakes challenges notions of individuality. Do shared names diminish uniqueness, or do they enrich identity by linking individuals to a broader narrative?

Philosophical Perspectives:

- Advaita Vedanta (Eastern Tradition): Emphasizes unity and interconnectedness, suggesting namesakes symbolize the oneness of existence.
- Western Individualism: Celebrates unique identity, viewing namesakes as a challenge to personal distinction.


Thus by Embracing the Legacy of Namesakes

Namesakes are not mere coincidences; they are threads woven into the fabric of human history, culture, and identity. They remind us that while names may repeat across time and space, the stories they carry are unique to each individual. From Achilles to Arthur, Helen to Aeneas, namesakes in mythology and literature have enriched our understanding of humanity, offering timeless lessons about love, courage, and the complexity of human nature. In the modern age, namesakes continue to connect us, whether through digital platforms or shared cultural traditions. Ultimately, the phenomenon of namesakes invites us to embrace both our individuality and our shared humanity. It challenges us to see beyond the surface of names, recognizing the deeper connections that bind us to one another and to the stories that define us.

In a world increasingly defined by division and fragmentation, namesakes stand as powerful symbols of unity, reminding us that behind every name lies a story worth sharing—a story that is at once deeply personal and profoundly universal.

Timeless Names in Indian scriptures: Bridging Eras Through Archetypes

Just as modern video games use recurring names to weave thematic continuity across different timelines, mythology, particularly in the Mahabharata, also employs recurring characters who transcend eras. These figures, whether in the form of sages or heroes, represent schools of thought or archetypal qualities that remain consistent across various episodes in cosmic history.

Timeless Characters in the Puranas with repeated appearances in different times and eras.


Were they same people or people from the same school of thoughts or people with namesakes?

Name

Symbolism & Literary Reinterpretations

Veda Vyasa

Sage Veda Vyasa is a timeless figure, both as the composer of the Mahabharata and as a pivotal character within it. He advises kings, performs crucial rituals, and ensures the transmission of dharma. His presence across multiple yugas (ages) highlights the continuity of wisdom. Much like Link from The Legend of Zelda, Vyasa embodies the archetype of the wise mentor, a guiding force across epochs.

Vashishtha and Viswamitra

These two sages represent contrasting yet complementary ideologies—Vashishtha embodies divine order, while Viswamitra champions human effort and ambition. Their philosophical debates in texts like the Ramayana symbolize the eternal tension between destiny and free will. Similar to Chris Redfield in Resident Evil, who evolves over time but maintains his core values, they remain relevant across different narratives and ages.

Parashurama

The axe-wielding warrior-sage Parashurama appears throughout various yugas, mentoring legendary figures like Bhishma, Drona, and Karna. He represents the relentless struggle against adharma (injustice) and the cyclical nature of history. His presence across timelines is akin to Alex Mason in Call of Duty: Black Ops, whose journey spans different periods, symbolizing the persistence of justice and vengeance.

Narada Muni

The celestial sage Narada serves as a divine messenger and catalyst for events in Hindu scriptures. His interventions, though mischievous, propel narratives forward and reveal deeper truths. Similar to John Marston in Red Dead Redemption, whose legacy is carried on by his son, Narada’s influence echoes across generations, ensuring the continuity of wisdom, wit, and devotion.


Now slowly entering into the realm of the Mahabharata:

In the Mahabharata, the story of Chitrāngada offers a fascinating exploration of the concept of namesakes. Chitrāngada, the elder son of Shantanu and Satyavati, is a central figure whose narrative delves into themes of ego, identity, and mortality. When juxtaposed with Krishna's teachings in the Bhagavad Gita, these themes illuminate the delicate interplay between individuality and universality.

The Dual Chitrāngadas: A Clash of Identities

The Mahabharata recounts the tale of two Chitrāngadas—one, the Kuru king, and the other, a Gandharva. The Kuru Chitrāngada, though a great warrior, succumbed to pride and hubris, which alienated him from dharma. His arrogance invited a challenge from the Gandharva Chitrāngada, who claimed there could only be one individual bearing that name.

The ensuing three-year battle on the banks of the Hiranyavati River ended with the Gandharva emerging victorious, leading to the Kuru king's death. This confrontation underscores the ephemeral nature of individual identity. The notion of "only one Chitrāngada" highlights how a name, despite its association with specific individuals, can also symbolize broader archetypes or ideals.

In a philosophical sense, the clash reflects the tension between personal ego and universal truth. The Gandharva's victory signifies the triumph of cosmic order over individual pride, a theme echoed throughout the Mahabharata.

Krishna and Arjuna: Beyond Names and Roles

In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna's declaration—"Amongst the descendants of Vrishni, I am Krishna, and amongst the Pandavas, I am Arjuna" (BG 10.37)—further explores the interplay between individuality and universality. Here, Krishna identifies himself with Arjuna, emphasizing their divine connection rather than their roles as preceptor and disciple.

Arjuna, despite being Krishna's friend and devotee, initially perceives himself as distinct due to his ego and sense of individuality. This distinction is crucial for the teacher-disciple dynamic, as it allows the transfer of knowledge. However, as the Gita unfolds, Arjuna gradually transcends his ego, understanding his unity with the Self—a state where individuality dissolves, and the distinction between preceptor and disciple vanishes.

In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna's declaration, "Amongst the descendants of Vrishni, I am Krishna, and amongst the Pandavas, I am Arjuna," reflects a profound unity that transcends the boundaries of individuality. By avoiding labeling Arjuna solely as a disciple, Krishna emphasizes their relationship as one of mutual respect, camaraderie, and devotion. This dynamic represents an intricate interplay between teacher and student, ego and egolessness, individuality and universality. As long as the disciple views themselves as distinct from the teacher, the illusion of separation persists. However, when the disciple transcends their ego and attains self-realization, the distinction dissolves, revealing an inseparable unity. This ancient understanding of self-transcendence finds intriguing parallels in modern scientific explorations of self-representation.

The Neuroscience of Self: Bridging the Bhagavad Gita and Modern Psychology

In contemporary psychology and neuroscience, the self is no longer considered solely a metaphysical concept but has been subjected to quantitative analysis. The distinction between the "self as subject" and "self as object" mirrors the relationship between the preceptor and disciple. Modern research suggests that the self can be assessed through biases towards self-associated stimuli, shedding light on the subjective and objective dimensions of self-perception. This duality resonates with the Bhagavad Gita's depiction of Krishna and Arjuna as distinct yet inherently connected manifestations of the same universal essence.

Neuroscientific models describe the self as an emergent property arising from interactions among three primary networks: the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and the insula. The mPFC, which is central to self-referential processing, corresponds to Krishna's role as the guiding force, encouraging Arjuna to introspect and confront his doubts. This brain region enables us to reflect on our identity, values, and purpose, much like Arjuna's introspection during his existential crisis.

The dlPFC, responsible for cognitive control and decision-making, parallels the disciple’s effort to align their actions with the teacher’s guidance. Just as Arjuna struggled to make choices amidst his inner turmoil, the dlPFC manages the cognitive dissonance that arises when personal desires conflict with moral responsibilities. This network helps regulate thoughts and actions, steering them toward coherence and purpose.

The insula, which forms part of the salience network, detects and assigns significance to self-relevant stimuli. It mirrors the emotional resonance and heightened awareness Arjuna experiences during his dialogue with Krishna. The insula's role in integrating emotional and physical states corresponds to the transformative power of the teacher-disciple relationship, where the disciple begins to perceive the deeper layers of selfhood and reality.

These networks do not function in isolation but interact dynamically, much like Krishna and Arjuna's evolving relationship. Their interplay creates a cohesive sense of self, transcending mere individual components. This neural model aligns with the Gita’s teaching that self-realization is not about negating individuality but integrating it into a greater unity.

The clinical significance of this framework is profound, particularly in computational psychiatry. Disorders like depression or schizophrenia often involve disruptions in these neural networks, leading to fragmented self-representation. Interventions aimed at restoring balance within these networks can help patients rebuild a coherent sense of identity. Similarly, Krishna’s teachings to Arjuna offer a blueprint for navigating crises by fostering self-awareness, emotional regulation, and a sense of interconnectedness.

Thus, Krishna’s assertion of being both Krishna and Arjuna encapsulates the essence of selfhood as both individual and universal. By bridging ancient wisdom with modern neuroscience, we gain a holistic understanding of the self as a dynamic, emergent phenomenon. The journey from disciple to realized being, from fragmented to integrated self, underscores the timeless quest for unity that lies at the heart of human experience.

So in which way are we going?

Have you noticed it is an interesting direction where we are moving? From the story of namesakes we are now diverging towards the philosophy of “self”. 

Wait halt! Is it getting complicated?

Well then look at the following three consecutive stories from Mahabharata. Can you identify the concept of “Namesake” aligned to our today’s theme? 

[The following 3 tales are taken as narrated by Subodh Ghosh in his book keeping the essence of Mahabharata’s main story intact]

Story 1: The Birth of Chavan

The great sage Bhrigu called out, "Puloma!"

His voice, austere and revered, summoned his wife, who, setting aside her tasks, hastened to stand before him. In the household of a sage, duty was sacred; for Puloma, answering her husband's call was an unbroken tradition, a solemn vow. Her life was woven into Bhrigu’s through sacred chants and unwavering devotion. She was his wife, his partner in dharma, the vessel through which his lineage would continue.

In the sacred texts of Hindu mythology, the tale of Sage Bhrigu and his wife Puloma unfolds as a profound narrative of love, betrayal, and cosmic consequences. Bhrigu, one of the revered Saptarishis and a mind-born son of Brahma, was married to Puloma, a woman of unparalleled beauty and virtue. Their union was blessed. 

Now, that moment was near—she carried his progeny within her. To her, this fulfillment of destiny was both an honor and a burden, elevating her status yet binding her further to the strict order of the sage’s life.

"I go now to bathe, Puloma," Bhrigu said.

"Go, my lord," she replied, her voice laced with reverence.

As he departed, Puloma resumed her tasks, yet an inexplicable distraction clung to her. A strange, recurring detachment clouded her mind. She paused, caught in the grip of an unseen force, neither resisting nor understanding its pull.

Hutashana, the fore God the aged caretaker of Bhrigu’s household, observed her. He had watched Puloma grow from a young maiden into a devoted wife. He alone perceived her moments of silent turmoil. But another presence, unseen and unbidden, had also taken note.

"Puloma!"

The voice was neither her husband’s nor the old caretaker’s. Yet it carried an uncanny familiarity, an echo from a forgotten past, a whisper from a dream once real. She turned, and in that instant, she understood—he had returned.

The ignoble Puloma, her childhood companion, her first love, now stood at the threshold of her rigidly structured life, demanding a reckoning. His presence stirred a dormant storm within her. She, once the proud and dutiful wife, felt the whisper of a forgotten spring.

"Come with me, Puloma," he said softly.

She hesitated. "Where would you take me?"

"To my world, my life," he answered, his voice heavy with longing.

Struggling against the tide of emotions, she demanded, "By what right do you stand here, defying the order of a sage’s home?"

"By the right of love."

"And by what right should I follow you?"

"By the right to live as a lover," he declared.

His weary face bore the weight of unfulfilled passion, yet in his eyes shone a fire untouched by renunciation or restraint. "I seek not a son, Puloma. I seek only you."

His words, a hymn of unchained love, struck the chords of her deepest self. He did not see her as a wife, a mother, or a vessel of lineage—he saw her as a woman, a being in her own right. His love was pure, untamed, free from societal decree.

"My longing is fulfilled in you," he said. "You are my first and last love. My cosmos begins and ends with you."

Puloma, bound to duty, felt the weight of her fate pressing down on her. She was a wife taken for a son, an ornament of necessity, with no higher purpose than fulfilling her dharma. Yet, the pull of the ignoble’s words washed away the strength of her protests.

Still, she whispered, "Do not ask me to stray beyond the bounds of dharma."

"What is dharma?" he asked, bewildered.

Puloma faltered. "I cannot answer that."

"But I must know," he pressed. "What is dharma?"

"Ask Hutashana the noble fire God," she said. "Let him decide."

Together, they stood before the elder. The ignoble Puloma spoke, his voice steady yet filled with unrelenting emotion.

"Lord Hutashana, you once saw us as childhood companions. Now, years later, we stand side by side again. Tell me, where is the wrongdoing in this? What is dharma?"

Agni, the fire was placed in a dilemma, feared the repercussions of both truth and falsehood. After contemplation, he responded, "Puloma was indeed first promised to you, but her father later gave her to Sage Bhrigu in a ceremony witnessed by the divine. She is rightfully Bhrigu's wife."

The old, wise divine, replied, "That which is true, that alone is dharma."

"And what is truth?"

Hutashana’s words rang with timeless clarity. "Truth is the event itself."

Puloma turned to him, her voice trembling yet firm. "Tell me, is the claim of first love false? Is it wrong to seek what the heart yearns for? Is it a sin to demand the fulfillment of one’s soul?"

"No," the elder said. "It is not false."

Puloma looked at the ignoble Puloma, wonder in her eyes. He extended his hand, and she took it. Together, they stepped beyond the rigid walls of her past, into the boundless unknown.

Yet, even in the embrace of newfound freedom, a shadow followed Puloma. In a secluded forest hut, the fragrance of wildflowers swirled around them, but her thoughts remained tethered to what she had left behind.

She broke her silence. "Did you know that I am with child?"

"Yes," he said gently.

"This child is Bhrigu’s."

"I know."

Puloma’s voice grew resolute. "This child must know the truth of its father. I cannot dishonor its lineage."

The uncivlized Puloma, struck by the force of her conviction, felt his love, his joy, his purpose crumble. She saw it in his eyes—the realization that, for all his passion, he was an outsider to the truth she could not forsake.

In that moment, the essence of their love was laid bare: not boundless, not triumphant, but tragic. As the weight of her decision settled, Puloma knew—love had led her away, but truth would always call her back.

And so, even as the untamed Puloma held her hand, she slipped away, vanishing into the horizon of her fate.

As he sped through the forest, the distress caused Puloma to prematurely give birth. The newborn, radiant as the sun, fell from her womb, and upon witnessing this miraculous child, Puloman was instantly reduced to ashes. The child was named Chyavana, meaning "the fallen one," signifying his unusual birth.


Puloma, cradling her son, returned to the hermitage, her tears forming a river along her path. When Bhrigu learned of the events, he was overcome with fury. Holding Agni responsible for revealing Puloma's identity, he cursed the fire deity, declaring, "You shall become the devourer of all things." Agni, feeling unjustly condemned, retreated from his duties, leading to chaos in the cosmic order. The gods, realizing the essential role of Agni in rituals and the sustenance of life, sought him out and persuaded him to resume his duties, assuring him that the curse would not taint his purity.

Story 2: Love story and revenge of Ruru

Chyavana’s lineage further carried forth through his son Pramati, who in turn was blessed with Ruru. Born of celestial grace, Ruru was the son of Pramati and the divine apsara Ghritachi, whose ethereal presence marked his heritage with both earthly wisdom and heavenly charm.

This illustrious son of Pramati, Ruru, arrived at the hermitage of the great sage Sthulakesha. Finding the sage absent, he was about to leave when something caught his eye, causing him to halt in wonder. In the gentle twilight, amidst the delicate hues of the evening sky, he perceived not the moon’s orb but a hidden blossom, veiled within the lush foliage of the hermitage grounds.

As he approached, his suspicions were confirmed—this was no mere illusion. A maiden of radiant beauty stood before him, as if a celestial artist had sculpted her from moonlight, collecting the soft luminescence of the night. Her form seemed to embody the ethereal charm of the moon, as though a moon-thirsty might swoon upon this verdant canopy at the mere sight of her. The southern breeze, carrying the fragrance of sandalwood, would only grow cooler, touched by her serene smile and gentle glow.

Ruru asked with a gentle curiosity, “May I know who you are, O fair one?”

The maiden replied, “I am Pramadvara, daughter of the sage Sthulakesha. And who might you be?”

“I am Ruru, son of Pramati, of the illustrious lineage of Bhrigu.”

Ruru gazed upon the young maiden, her beauty akin to a full moon’s blossom. His heart trembled with awe, as if his gaze were a thirst unquenched. Her graceful form, though that of a hermit’s daughter, bore no trace of asceticism. Enchanted, Ruru beheld her as if a slumbering fragrance of the ketaki flower’s midnight yearning lingered upon her parted lips. Faint marks of pollen adorned her champak-hued neck, perhaps remnants of a languorous bee’s amorous kiss in the soft afternoon light. The radiant Pramadvara stood before him, her forehead graced by a mysterious golden hue, as if...

The delicate mark upon her forehead resembled an enchanting tilak, as if a butterfly had left the imprint of its winged dust before fluttering away. Ruru observed, captivated, as though the vibrant crimson of the blossoming kurubaka flower had emerged from the embrace of her ample bosom.

Ruru spoke softly, "Your name is truly befitting."

Pramadvara, curious, asked, "Why? What meaning do you find in my name?"

Ruru replied, "You are Pramadvara, the finest among all delights of the earth. The bees and butterflies of every blooming grove yearn desperately to bask in the radiance of your beauty, to partake in the splendor of your blossoming youth. Blessed indeed is your form."

At Ruru’s words, Pramadvara’s gaze fluttered toward him, only to retreat, as if a tender dream within her heart had been struck by an unseen arrow. She had not sought such flattery, nor did she welcome it, for she understood the hollowness of praise that merely adorned the surface. What joy could be found in beauty that was but an ornament of desire, in a life that flickered like a transient flame?

"O Pramadvara, with lips like ripe fruit!" Ruru called again, his voice thick with longing.

Startled, she lifted her gaze, her eyes veiled with quiet sorrow. "Such words do not befit the daughter of a sage," she murmured.

Humbled, Ruru lowered his head. "Forgive me, Pramadvara, for my words were thoughtless. I know not the depths of your soul, nor the aspirations you hold close to your heart."

His eyes, dark as monsoon-laden clouds, pleaded with an intensity that she could not ignore. "Can you not see the depth of my yearning in these captivated eyes?"

Pramadvara sighed, a whisper of wind rustling autumn leaves. "I see it," she admitted softly. "Your eyes are indeed enchanted."

"Enchanted is not only my gaze but every pulse within me, overwhelmed as the evening sky turns crimson, casting its hues upon the pure white autumn clouds. Like a delicate doe with modest eyes, O woman of ethereal grace, your presence ignites a fire within me. O slender-waisted beauty, my arms long to cradle your unparalleled form, my heart trembling with longing. Come, in this auspicious moment, let us consecrate our souls in the grand festival of fleeting love."

Pramadvara recoiled as if the breath of a venomous serpent had touched her skin. Before her stood not Ruru, the noble son of Pramati, but a tempest of unbridled desire, cloaked in the guise of love.

"You are no ascetic, Pramadvara," Ruru whispered, pain threading his voice.

"No, I am not," she admitted. "But I am a woman nurtured in the love of my father’s wisdom. A maiden, and this modesty is the essence of my being."

Ruru's voice trembled, "Such rigid modesty has no place in the creed of love, O lady."

Pramadvara’s eyes, luminous as the moon’s reflection on a still lake, darkened with sorrow. "Perhaps. But your masculinity has strayed from its virtue."

Ruru’s breath quickened. "Then why this severe modesty?"

"Because I am but an ordinary woman," she said, her voice firm yet gentle. "A woman whose heart beats with the weight of tradition and honor. Love is not a mere indulgence; it is a sacred trust."

Ruru’s frustration cracked through his voice. "Such a creed is but a cage!"

Pramadvara’s gaze did not waver. "Then it is a cage of gold, one that preserves the sanctity of my soul."

His hands clenched into fists, his pride wounded by her rejection. "You mock love as if it were a passing whim. Does the spring blossom turn away from the cuckoo’s song? Does the lotus frown at the swan’s call? Does the evening sky grieve at the sight of twilight’s embrace?"

Pramadvara’s eyes shimmered with an emotion unfathomable. "I am no celestial nymph, Ruru. No daughter of the heavens to surrender to the fleeting joys of passion. No true daughter of a sage would."

A bitter smile curled at Ruru’s lips. "Then hear this, Pramadvara. I am the son of a fleeting love. The celestial nymph Ghritachi is my mother."

Pramadvara gasped, her pulse quickening. "What do you mean?"

"My very existence is woven from transience. And yet, am I not human? Do I not love as deeply as the earth loves the sky?"

Tears pooled in Pramadvara’s eyes. "I, too, am no true sage’s daughter. My father is not of this earth..."

Ruru’s expression softened. "Then cast away this pretense, O celestial one, and let love triumph. Come, let our union be sanctified by the soft whispers of the evening breeze."

Pramadvara hesitated, her heart waging war between duty and desire. "But..."

"No false doubts, Pramadvara. You are not bound by the rigid chains of asceticism."

She stood, beautiful as the ketaki flower scorched by an invisible fire, her silence heavier than a thousand words.

Ruru’s voice, laced with sorrow, broke the stillness. "I understand now, Pramadvara."

She turned to him, her face a portrait of grief. "What do you understand?"

"You belong to another. That is why you spurn me so easily."

A cry of anguish escaped her lips. "Do not be cruel without cause, Ruru!"

"Am I not the only one you desire?" he demanded.

Her answer was like the hush before a storm. "You are the only man I have ever longed for. In my dreams, you appeared; on garden paths, I watched you. Hidden beneath the shade of trees, I gathered the unopened buds of my heart, waiting for your touch to bloom them. And when you did, the moon bore silent witness."

Ruru’s laughter, tinged with mockery, echoed through the dusk. "Do you seek eternal love, daughter of the fleeting nymph?"

"Yes, Ruru. I wish to be your eternal companion."

"Why?"

"Because love is not a passing indulgence. It is a life chosen. A life where your weariness will find solace in my care, your resolve will find strength in my support, your sorrow will seek refuge in my arms."

His heart wavered, unsure if her words were veiling rejection or an oath of devotion.

"Then take my hand, Pramadvara," he said at last, "and let the evening sky witness our union. Let my kiss baptize your hands in love."

She pressed her palms together in prayer, her eyes glistening. "Forgive me today, Ruru. I will go to my father and seek his blessing. Come, and let our love be sanctified under his gaze."

Ruru stood silent as she turned away, leaving him to the ache of love governed by laws he could not fathom. He could have cursed her; he could have left, scorning her devotion to rituals. But how could he? How could he despise a woman whose love was as radiant as the evening sky, yet as elusive as a dream slipping through his fingers?

And so, with words sweet as honey yet laden with resolve, Ruru vowed to shatter the chains of her ritualistic love.

"Let it be so, my dear," he whispered, as she disappeared into the night.

The moment Ruru saw Pramadvara, his heart did a backflip, tripped over itself, and landed straight into a pool of love. From that day on, nothing else in the world made sense to him. Food? Tasteless. Sleep? Overrated. Responsibilities? What’s that?

He was like a broken record stuck on one tune—Pramadvara, Pramadvara, Pramadvara. If someone asked him to fetch water, he’d walk to the well, stare dreamily at the reflection of the sky, and forget why he was there. If he sat down to meditate, he’d start chanting, "Pramadvara... Pramadvara..." instead of the sacred mantras.

At this point, even his friends started betting on how long it would take before he forgot his own name. His mind had officially packed its bags, booked a one-way ticket, and moved into Pramadvara Land, never to return.

The moment Ruru’s father, Pramati, heard about his son’s love-struck, food-boycotting, daydreaming condition, he knew it was time for some good old-fashioned matchmaking. So, off he went to Sage Sthulakesha’s house, armed with his best "My son is amazing, please give me your daughter" speech.

Pramati didn’t waste any time. He walked right up to Sthulakesha and said, Listen, my son has been struck by Cupid, and the only cure is your daughter. Let’s get them married before he forgets how to eat permanently.”

Sthulakesha was absolutely thrilled. He clapped his hands and said, “Oh, what a fantastic idea! Your son isn’t just good-looking—he’s smart, well-mannered, and has the patience of a sage! Honestly, I was hoping for this match too!”

So, like two wise wedding planners, they pulled out their celestial calendars, did some serious astrological math, and found the perfect wedding date—just a few weeks away, under the auspicious Phandhuni Nakshatra. With that, the entire hermitage exploded into wedding-prep mode. 

However, destiny had a different fun, alas! One day, while playing near the hermitage with her companions, Pramadvara unknowingly stepped on a deadly black cobra hidden in the grass. The enraged serpent bit her.

Oh, what a tragedy! The very maiden who had been laughing moments ago fell lifeless, her golden complexion turning ashen as she collapsed to the ground.

Her companions screamed in terror, summoning the entire hermitage. Seeing her lifeless body, everyone was struck with grief. Even the sages, wise and detached, sat in stunned silence, tears streaming down their faces. Pramadvara’s face, though darkened by death, still bore a serene sweetness, as if she were merely asleep.

Ruru, hearing the cries, rushed to the scene. The sight shattered him. Overwhelmed, he ran madly into the forest, unable to accept that Pramadvara was truly gone.

Ruru stood frozen, his heart shattering as the wails of the ashram women tore through the air like a cruel wind. Moments ago, the world had been golden, alive with the promise of love, of union, of a future filled with laughter and devotion. And now—now it had collapsed into a dark abyss of despair.

Pushing past the grieving onlookers, Ruru fell to his knees beside Pramadvara’s lifeless form. The warmth of her presence, the radiance of her being— all had vanished in the blink of an eye. Her face, once glowing with love, lay pale, drained of the life that had danced within her just moments ago. Her lips, which had murmured tender words meant only for him, now lay motionless, as if time itself had stolen her voice.

With trembling fingers, he reached for her wrist, desperate to feel the pulse that had once beat so sweetly beneath her skin. But there was nothing. Only silence. A silence so deep, so terrible, that it crushed his soul beneath its weight.

Pramatiputra Ruru, the future husband of Pramadvara, stood frozen in despair. The lifeless body of the venom-stricken maiden lay before him, and the forest dwellers, overwhelmed by grief, wept bitterly. But Ruru—his sorrow too deep, his anguish too unbearable—could not remain there. He stumbled out of the hermitage, his heart a storm of pain.

"Ruruduḥ kṛpayābhiṣṭaḥ rurus tvārto bahiryayau.
Te cha sarve dvijaśreṣṭhās tatraivopāviśaṁs tadā."

The best of the sages sat in mourning, but Ruru, lost in sorrow, wandered into the silent depths of the forest. His cries tore through the emptiness as he called upon Pramadvara, his beloved now lost to death.

“Shhete sa bhubi tannvangi mama shokabibardhanee. Praanapaharantibi poornachandranivaanana.”
(“She lies upon the earth, her frail body fueling the fire of my grief. Her full-moon face, now lifeless, is stealing the breath from my own existence.”)

A life once promised, a love once blooming, now lay cold and still beneath the sky. And Ruru, drowned in his sorrow, wept till the stars themselves seemed to mourn.

“No... no, this cannot be,” he gasped, his breath ragged, his voice barely more than a whisper. He clutched her cold hands, his own body quaking as a single tear slipped down his cheek. “Pramadvara, my love, open your eyes! Look at me! Say my name just once more!”

But she did not stir. She did not answer. The dreadful hush of death lay between them like an unbridgeable chasm.

The sages stood around, their heads bowed, their faces etched with sorrow. Maharshi Sthulakesha, who had only moments ago dreamed of his daughter’s wedding, now sat motionless, his body trembling with unspeakable grief. Pramati, Ruru’s father, placed a hand upon his son’s shoulder, but no words of comfort came. What words could mend a heart that had just been torn apart?

Ruru’s chest burned with unbearable agony. Why? Why had fate been so merciless? Just when happiness had stretched its arms toward him, the cruel hands of destiny had snatched it away. Was this the will of the gods? Had the heavens conspired against him?

His anguish erupted into a cry that shook the very trees. “No! I will not accept this!” His voice, hoarse with sorrow, rang through the ashram like the howl of a wounded beast. “Pramadvara cannot leave me like this! She is mine, my heart, my soul—how can the gods be so cruel?”

His grief-stricken gaze lifted to the sky, eyes blazing with defiance. “O divine ones, you mock me with this fate! But I will not surrender! If love is truly greater than death, then let it prove its power today!”

He turned, wild with desperation, to the assembled sages. “Tell me—is there a way? Can she be brought back? Can her life be restored?”



A heavy silence followed. The sages exchanged sorrowful glances, their wisdom rendered powerless before the inevitability of death. Finally, Maharshi Sthulakesha, his voice weighed with unbearable grief, spoke. “O noble Ruru, death does not heed the cries of mortals. Pramadvara was destined for this fate—the venom of the serpent has claimed her. What power can stand against Yama, the lord of death?”

“But there must be a way!” Ruru’s voice cracked with desperation. “Austerities, mantras, penance—I will do anything! I will fight the very gods if I must, but I cannot—**I will not—**let her go like this!”

At this, an elderly sage stepped forward, his expression unreadable. “There exists a path, but it is one of great peril. If you are truly willing, Ruru, then listen well.”

“Speak, revered one!” Ruru begged. “Tell me, and I will do whatever it takes!”

The sage’s voice was grave, each word weighted with consequence. “There is a way to reclaim her from the grasp of death. The gods may grant her life… but only in exchange for half of your own.”

A stunned hush fell over the ashram. The words, heavy as a funeral bell, hung in the air. The gathered sages shifted uneasily, their hearts heavy with the weight of such a sacrifice. To give up half of one’s life—to surrender years of one’s existence—was a price that no ordinary man would pay.

But Ruru did not hesitate. His love burned brighter than the fear of death. His voice was steady, unwavering. “I accept.”

Gasps rippled through the gathering. Even the aged sages, wise in the ways of fate, could not hide their astonishment.

Maharshi Pramati stepped forward, sorrow and pride warring in his eyes. “My son… do you truly understand what you are offering? You are young, and life stretches long before you.”

Ruru’s gaze did not waver. “What is life without her?” he whispered. His hands tightened around Pramadvara’s, as if willing his warmth to seep into her lifeless fingers. “If she does not walk beside me, then my years are empty. I would rather live half a life with her… than an eternity without her.”

A murmur swept through the sages, their voices hushed with awe. Here stood a man who defied the heavens, whose love burned so fiercely that even death itself quailed before it.

At his declaration, the sages prepared for the great invocation. Sacred mantras echoed through the air as offerings were made to the gods. Ruru stood before the fire, his hands raised in devotion, his heart pouring out in prayer. The very heavens seemed to tremble as the plea reached beyond mortal realms.

Then, from the shadows between worlds, Yama, the god of death, appeared.

His presence was a weight upon the earth, his gaze deep as the abyss. “Who calls upon me and dares to defy fate?”

“It is I, Ruru,” the young man declared, standing firm before the god. “I offer half of my life in exchange for Pramadvara’s.”

Yama’s dark eyes bore into Ruru’s soul. “You would give up your years for love?”

“Yes.”

A long silence stretched between them before Yama finally spoke. “So be it.”

A chilling wind swept through the ashram as the decree was sealed. And then, as suddenly as it had begun, the night’s darkness lifted. A soft breath stirred in the stillness. The sages gasped as Pramadvara’s fingers twitched, her lips parted, and color returned to her cheeks.

With a gasp, she opened her eyes.

The first thing she saw was Ruru, his face streaked with tears, his hands clutching hers with trembling devotion.

“Ruru…?” she whispered, as if awakening from a distant dream.

Overcome, he could only nod, pressing her hands to his heart.

The ashram erupted in joyous cries. The sages blessed the union that had defied fate itself. Maharshi Sthulakesha, wiping his tears, turned to Pramati. “Truly, your son’s love is greater than even the gods could have foreseen.”

And thus, on the sacred day under the Phalguni Nakshatra, Ruru and Pramadvara were united in marriage— a love tempered by loss, sanctified by sacrifice, and blessed by the very hands of destiny itself.

The joy of Ruru’s life had returned, yet a shadow lingered in his heart. The venomous fangs that had stolen Pramadvara’s breath, even for a fleeting moment, left a wound far deeper than time could heal. His love had been scarred, his trust shattered—he could not let it go.

A fire of vengeance blazed within him. How cruel was fate, that a mere serpent could so effortlessly steal away joy? No, he would not let this injustice stand. With a mighty staff in hand, he stormed into the forests, declaring war against the entire race of serpents. Any unfortunate creature that slithered into his path met swift retribution—before a hiss could escape its lips, the crushing blow of his staff would silence it forever.

Days turned to nights, and the forests whispered with the echoes of his wrath. He hunted through thick jungles, over jagged mountains, and across winding rivers. He became a force of destruction, striking terror into the very shadows where the serpents lay hidden.

One day, while searching for serpents deep in the jungle, he encountered a peculiar sight—a massive, ancient snake coiled under the shade of a gnarled tree. Unlike the others, this one did not slither away in fear nor bare its fangs in defense. It simply lay there, feeble and unmoving, its body frail like a withered vine.

Raising his staff high, Ruru prepared to strike, but before the blow could land, the serpent spoke, its voice heavy with time.

"O noble sage, why do you seek to end my life when I have done you no harm?" the snake asked.

Ruru’s grip tightened. "It matters not. A serpent once bit my beloved, and for that crime, all of your kind must perish!"

The snake sighed, a sound like the rustling of dry leaves. "You punish me for a sin I did not commit. We are not all the same. I am called Dundubha, and I have never harmed a soul. Why should I suffer for another's crime?"

For the first time, Ruru hesitated. His rage had been a wildfire, consuming all in its path. But now, the words of this frail serpent made him pause. Was vengeance just, when it failed to see truth?

"Who are you?" Ruru asked, lowering his staff. "Why do you speak like one burdened with sorrow?"

Dundubha’s dim eyes glowed faintly. "I was once a sage—Sahasrapada. A curse turned me into this form. My only crime was a jest gone wrong. I frightened my dearest friend, Khagam, with a straw serpent, never imagining it would make him faint with terror. In his anger, he cursed me to become like the very thing I had used to scare him. But guilt soon overtook his wrath, and with tears in his eyes, he told me, 'There is one path to your salvation. When you meet the noble Ruru of the Bhrigu lineage, your curse shall end.'"

Ruru's eyes widened. "And now you are before me..."

Even as he spoke, a transformation began. The serpent's withered body shuddered, and in an instant, scales melted into skin, fangs vanished, and a luminous form emerged—Sahasrapada, restored to his former self.

He stood before Ruru, smiling gently. "Your touch has freed me," he said. "But let me free you as well. You are of the Bhrigu clan, yet you wield vengeance like a warrior. This is not your path. Recall the tale of King Janamejaya, who sought to destroy all serpents in a grand sacrifice. Yet, even in his fury, he was stopped by the wisdom of the sage Astika, who pleaded for mercy. Destruction is never the answer. Mercy is the true path of the wise."

Ruru listened, the fire within him cooling like embers under the night sky. He had seen the face of injustice—an innocent punished for another’s crime. Could he truly walk forward, knowing he had become the very thing he hated?

As Sahasrapada bid him farewell, he disappeared into the forest, leaving behind only his words.

With a heavy heart, Ruru turned back, his hands looser on his staff, his mind stirring with new thoughts. He returned to the ashram, seeking his father Pramati—not for vengeance, but for wisdom.

"Tell me," he asked, "about the tale of Astika, the sage who saved the serpents."

For Ruru had learned that sometimes, knowledge, not wrath, was the mightiest weapon of all.

Astika was a firm believer in peace and non-violence. Lacking any authority to command an end to the serpent yajna, he chose instead to rely on the power of words, making a heartfelt plea to halt the sacrifice. His conviction was rooted in the wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita, which teaches that God resides in the hearts of all living beings:

Īśvaraḥ sarvabhūtānāṁ hṛddeśe’rjuna tiṣṭhati
Bhrāmayansarvabhūtāni yantrārūḍhāni māyayā

"O Arjuna, God exists in the heart of every living creature. He creates illusions and directs all beings as if they were machines under his control."

Understanding this profound truth, Astika believed that all living creatures deserved respect and that no harm should be inflicted upon them. His advocacy for non-violence was echoed in the teachings of Rishi Pramati, who narrated the Astika Parva to his son Ruru, emphasizing the sanctity of life. However, this was just one layer of the story. 


Story 3: Jaratkaru and birth of Astika

Sage Jaratkaru walks along a small forest pathway surrounded by lush greenery, with a light drizzle falling from the sky. Only his back is visible as he moves deeper into the forest, symbolizing simplicity and tranquility in ancient India.

In the twilight of an ancient lineage, where the river of blood runs thin, The elders, like autumn leaves, tremble at the winds of time. One last flame flickers in the temple of their name—Jaratkaru, A hermit wrapped in silence, his vows stronger than steel. A prince of penance, untouched by the world's embrace, Even kings bow their crowns at his feet, For his spirit, like a mountain, stands unmoved by mortal tides. Yet, the roots that bore him whisper in sorrow, Not for their age, but for the end of their song. The river must flow, say the voices of the past, Yet Jaratkaru sits by the banks, refusing to sail. His heart is a dry well, where love dares not bloom, And so, his forefathers sigh—an unquenched thirst beyond death. 

One night, the whispers find his ears, old voices wrapped in dust, "We die with pride, but not in peace, For the thread that binds us to time frays in your hands." Jaratkaru listens, like a monk before the storm, And the storm speaks again, "Duty is not yours to forsake, when you alone bear its weight." His reply is a sigh carved in stone, "I have wandered too far to find a home, I have forgotten the art of longing, Even the scent of union eludes me." 

The elders weep, but hope lingers— A woman waits, bound by fate's silent decree. Jaratkaru (she), a name like a shadow, A prayer unanswered, a warmth unreturned. She dreams of a touch that never lands, Of a whisper never spoken. Her nights bloom with longing, Not for love, nor for passion’s fire, But for a single ember to break the frost of his soul. Yet, she is but a vessel of duty, an echo of a promise, And he, a man of stone, unmoved by her sighs. Then, in a moment, the stone cracks. 

A hand clasps a hand— Not in love, but in the weight of fate. Like a storm too long restrained, Jaratkaru breaks his silence, yet she resists. "Rishi, the hour of prayer has come." Silence. Then, the fire of insult burns in his eyes. "You dare remind me of duty?" "Is it not a wife’s right?" "No. You are but a witness to my path, not its keeper." A sigh passes between them, the sigh of a woman unclaimed, 

A wife by name, yet not by soul. A prisoner of duty, she bows, Not to surrender, but to endure. And so, the hermit walks away, Leaving her in the ruins of an unfulfilled bond. Her voice follows, not in plea, but in command. "You promised, Rishi. Not to me, but to the ones who came before." 

The winds pause, the lamps flicker, Jaratkaru halts, his shadow tethered to hers. He turns, not as a lover, But as a man shackled to fate’s decree. His hand finds hers—not in devotion, but in duty.

In due time, their union bore fruit, and a son was born to them. He was named Astika, a child of profound wisdom and unparalleled spiritual potential. Even as an infant, Astika radiated an energy that spoke of his extraordinary destiny. Vasuki rejoiced, for he saw in Astika the hope for the Nagas, whose doom had been prophesied.

Sage Jaratkaru was a tapaswi of extreme austerity, devoted entirely to penance and self-discipline. A strict brahmachari, he followed the traditions of the Yayavara lineage, wandering from village to village without attachment, performing Agnihotra and other sacred rituals. His ascetic lifestyle granted him immense divine power, but as he aged, he remained without an heir, unaware of the dire consequences this would bring to his ancestors.

One day, during his wanderings, Jaratkaru encountered his ancestors hanging upside down in a pit, their feet barely held by fragile veerana plant fibers. They revealed that their suffering was due to the near extinction of their lineage—if Jaratkaru remained childless, they would fall into oblivion. Deeply moved, he vowed to marry, not for personal desire but to save his family’s lineage. However, he set conditions: the bride must share his name and be offered to him as charity.

Vasuki, the king of serpents, answered his call, offering his sister—also named Jaratkaru—as his bride. 

Meanwhile, Jaratkaru, the father, had not abandoned his austerities. One evening, as he sat in deep meditation, he opened his eyes and looked at his wife. His face was impassive, yet his words carried a finality that sent a shiver through the air. "O Jaratkaru, our union was never meant for worldly pleasure. My duty has been fulfilled. A son has been born, and with him, my ancestors are now liberated. I must now take leave of this householder's life and return to my penance."

Jaratkaru, the wife, remained composed, for she too had anticipated this moment. Her voice was steady as she replied, "O great sage, I have known from the beginning that you are not one to remain bound by earthly ties. Your path is that of renunciation, and I shall not stand in the way of your dharma. But know this—your son, Astika, shall be the savior of my kin. The Nagas shall look to him in their hour of peril."

With a final glance at his wife and son, Jaratkaru departed into the forest, his form disappearing into the shadows, leaving behind a legacy of duty and sacrifice.

As Astika grew, he inherited the wisdom of his father and the resilience of his mother. Under the guidance of both his maternal uncle, Vasuki, and the sages who recognized his divine potential, he became a beacon of knowledge and dharma. The prophecy that Vasuki had feared—the great Sarpa Satra, the snake sacrifice of King Janamejaya—was drawing near. But Astika, armed with wisdom and righteousness, would stand between fate and his mother’s kin, determined to change the course of destiny itself.

Self-Reflection and Cosmic Connection: From the above three Narratives of Mahabharata

The Mahabharata presents profound philosophical ideas through interconnected stories. In three consecutive narratives, the text explores the Pratibimba (reflection) concept in Advaita Vedanta, symbolizing the meeting of the self with itself.

Chyavana’s Birth: Deviation from the Cosmic Self

The story of Chyavana begins with his mother Puloma being abducted by Puloma, the Rakshasa, symbolizing desire and lust. Chyavana, born prematurely (Chuta, deviated), contrasts Krishna, the Achyuta (immutable self). This narrative signifies the initial disconnection from the cosmic self.

Ruru and Sahasrapada: The Journey of Recognition

Ruru, Chyavana’s grandson, son of Pramati(proof) represents the human tendency to act impulsively. In a moment of vengeance for his wife Pramadwara (symbolizing inattentiveness/madness), Ruru mistakes a lizard for a snake. The lizard (Dundhuva literally means both snake or lizard), revealed as Sahasrapada Ruru (one who has walked fifty steps further than Ruru), represents a wiser, experienced version of himself, who guides him towards Astika (existence, it exists), showing the journey of self-awareness. Note: Snakes in Indian mythology often denotes descent/pravritti marga/ sustainability while the birds (eg. Khagam means bird) represent ascent/nivritti marga/moksha. 

Astika’s Birth: Union and Realization

Astika is born from the union of the sage Jaratkaru and the serpent Jaratkaru, namesakes signifying destruction (Jaratkaru means "monstrous destruction"). Their union embodies the annihilation of ego and ignorance, leading to existential realization.

Philosophical Reflection

These stories exemplify the journey of self-recognition, rooted in Advaita Vedanta. As Shankaracharya explains, the self is like a crystal reflecting a red flower’s color, perceiving borrowed attributes as its own. The narratives illustrate how deviations, mistakes, and destruction can lead to cosmic understanding, where the individual self merges with the universal consciousness. To be precise it reflects the Prabimbavada concept. Pratibimba-vāda, or the "theory of reflection," is a significant concept within Advaita Vedanta, particularly as expounded in the Pañcapādikā Vivaraṇa by Prakāśātmamuni. This doctrine offers a nuanced perspective on the relationship between the individual self (jīva) and the supreme self (īśvara), emphasizing their apparent distinctions as products of a singular ignorance (avidyā).



What is Reflection Theory?

In pratibimba-vāda, the jīva is conceived as the reflection of pure consciousness (caitanya) within avidyā, while īśvara represents the original, unblemished caitanya. This relationship can be likened to the reflection of a face in a mirror: the reflection (jīva) appears distinct from the actual face (īśvara) in terms of size and location, yet this distinction is illusory. Just as the reflection has no independent existence apart from the face, the jīva is not truly separate from īśvara.

This theory contrasts with other Advaita Vedanta perspectives, such as avaccheda-vāda and ābhāsa-vāda. Avaccheda-vāda posits that the individual self is a limitation of consciousness, akin to space being divided by various containers, suggesting that jīva and īśvara are the same consciousness confined by different adjuncts. Ābhāsa-vāda, on the other hand, describes the jīva as an appearance of consciousness, similar to a holographic image, emphasizing the illusory nature of individual existence. Pratibimba-vāda distinguishes itself by attributing the apparent difference between jīva and īśvara to a single avidyā-upādhi, without proposing a separate upādhi for īśvara.

Pratibimbavada | The Universe is a Reflection

The metaphor of the mirror is central to understanding pratibimba-vāda. In this analogy, consciousness is the original face, and the mind or intellect (buddhi) acts as the mirror. The reflection of consciousness in the mind gives rise to the sense of individuality or ego (ahaṅkāra). However, this individuality is merely a reflection and lacks true substance; the underlying reality remains the non-dual consciousness.

Realistic Painted Portraits with ReflectionsIn essence, pratibimba-vāda elucidates the non-dual nature of reality by illustrating how the perception of individuality arises from ignorance. By recognizing the jīva as a mere reflection of īśvara, one can transcend the illusion of separateness and realize the fundamental unity of all existence.

Thus, by weaving together stories of namesakes and reflective counterparts, the Mahabharata offers a timeless meditation on the unity of existence and the profound realization of the self.


.... To be continued

  • 6 min read
  • 0
  • 0